-
The United States and the Need for ESG Legislation: Building on the Successes of the European Union
This Note examines the moral and legal implications of public education funding in the United States through the lens of John Rawls’ A Theory of Justice. It argues that the property tax-based public school funding model embeds morally arbitrary factors, such as wealth and geography, into the structure of opportunity itself, antithetical to Rawls’ principles…
-
Decriminalizing Hard Drugs: Revolution or Ruin?
This Note examines the moral and legal implications of public education funding in the United States through the lens of John Rawls’ A Theory of Justice. It argues that the property tax-based public school funding model embeds morally arbitrary factors, such as wealth and geography, into the structure of opportunity itself, antithetical to Rawls’ principles…
-
Medication Abortion’s Battle for Legality in Post-Roe America
This Note examines the moral and legal implications of public education funding in the United States through the lens of John Rawls’ A Theory of Justice. It argues that the property tax-based public school funding model embeds morally arbitrary factors, such as wealth and geography, into the structure of opportunity itself, antithetical to Rawls’ principles…
-
Plausible Alternatives to our Exclusionary “Winner-Takes-All” System: Proportional Representation and Its Merits
This Note examines the moral and legal implications of public education funding in the United States through the lens of John Rawls’ A Theory of Justice. It argues that the property tax-based public school funding model embeds morally arbitrary factors, such as wealth and geography, into the structure of opportunity itself, antithetical to Rawls’ principles…
-
Is Age Just a Number When It Comes to Judges?
This Note examines the moral and legal implications of public education funding in the United States through the lens of John Rawls’ A Theory of Justice. It argues that the property tax-based public school funding model embeds morally arbitrary factors, such as wealth and geography, into the structure of opportunity itself, antithetical to Rawls’ principles…